0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
NCAA made an announcement today that sure sounds like it's trying to change the rules on NIL midstream, identifying a lot of the organizations as "boosters" and not allowing them to participate.A lot of kids were already promised things, and it sounds like a lot of lawyers are about to get rich.
sounds like a lot of lawyers are about to get rich.
Nah, They're not going to punish the kid or the booster. They are going to punish the school. There will be nothing keeping the booster from paying the kid the promised NIL money. It’s just that his school is going to be penalized.
That sure is how it looks. I like the place our athletic department is in right now. I don't want them to get screwed because the rules changed or worse, are ambiguous.
They really haven’t changed. It’s always been impermissible for a booster to get directly involved in recruiting. It’s just that everyone thought that would be unenforceable with NIL and got cocky about it and started bragging and openly offering recruits.
it's been impermissible until the alston case came along. one of the interpretations of that ruling is that schools cannot limit trade between two parties that are not employees of that school. if this proposal gets into the courts and ends back up in front of this same scotus, i personally don't see any way that the ruling won't be the same.
what school has been punished? and at what school are students now employees?
They punishment awaits. One of the recent decisions within the last year or two basically described athletes as employees.
The P5 commissioners are spineless pussies wanting to go to Congress and invite government into the equation. The big schools need to pull out of the NCAA and make their own rules.
Government is already in. The courts blew up the NCAA. Congress are the only ones who can fix it.
and it sounds like a lot of lawyers are about to get rich.
That used to be the thing to do at Monkey Island at the Memphis Zoo, watch the monkeys beat off.
The website says the price is "TBA"-- I suppose to be announced.Will be interesting to see what they come up with for a price. Do they want a 500 members at $1,000 apiece? Or 5,000 members at $100 apiece?
5000 members and $1000